Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
71
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the
existential continuum in women
Reconfiguraciones en la construcción de la pareja: análisis del continuo existencial en las
mujeres
Reconfigurações na construção de casais: análise do continuum existencial nas mulheres
José Miguel Mayorga-González
D. in Complex Thought, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios-UNIMINUTO.
jose.mayorga@uniminuto.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-4824
José Antonio Camargo Barrero
Master in Social Intervention in Knowledge Societies. Specialist in Psychological
Intervention in Crisis Situations. Psychologist. Teacher-researcher at the Corporación
Universitaria Minuto de Dios-UNIMINUTO. jose.camargo@uniminuto.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-1109
María Alejandra Caita Alvarado
Psychologist in training. Research intern at Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios-
UNIMINUTO. mcaitaalvar@uniminuto.edu.co https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9103-5601
Received January 2020 - Accepted November 2020
Revista iberoamericana de educación.
Vol - 4 No. 1, January - March 2021
e-ISSN: 2737-632x
Pgs 71 - 89
Abstract: The dialogic exchange from digital media marks one of the main
spaces for couple building. Thus, this article seeks to understand the
experiences of women in the process of couple building from the existential
continuum and discontinuum, given the absence of information on women's
experiences in couple building today. The development of the same is framed
in the qualitative-phenomenological methodology, describing the subjective
and intersubjective accounts of women between 20 and 32 years old,
responding to the question "How are couple relationships constructed
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
72
nowadays from an existential point of view? As a result, two questions are
answered: What would be the present causes that maintain the way of existing
of women in the process of building a couple, and what would be, from the
results found, the way of existing that allows acting in a reflexive and
responsible way?
Key words: Couple; construction; dialogic; commitment; existential.
Resumen: El intercambio dialógico a partir de los medios digitales marca
uno de los principales espacios de construcción de pareja. Así, este artículo
busca comprender las experiencias de las mujeres en el proceso de
construcción de pareja desde el continuo y discontinuo existencial, dada la
ausencia de información sobre las experiencias de las mujeres en la
construcción de pareja en la actualidad. El desarrollo del mismo se enmarca
en la metodología cualitativa-fenomenológica, describiendo los relatos
subjetivos e intersubjetivos de mujeres de entre 20 y 32 años, respondiendo a
la pregunta "¿Cómo se construyen las relaciones de pareja en la actualidad
desde el punto de vista existencial? Como resultado, se responde a dos
preguntas: ¿Cuáles serían las causas actuales que mantienen el modo de
existir de las mujeres en el proceso de construcción de la pareja, y cuál sería,
a partir de los resultados encontrados, el modo de existir que permite actuar
de forma reflexiva y responsable?
Palabras clave: Pareja; construcción; dialógica; compromiso; existencial.
Resumo: A troca dialógica a partir de meios digitais marca um dos principais
espaços para a construção de casais. Assim, este artigo procura compreender
as experiências das mulheres no processo de construção de casais a partir do
continuum existencial e do descontinuo, dada a ausência de informação sobre
as experiências das mulheres na construção de casais nos dias de hoje. O
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
73
desenvolvimento do mesmo está enquadrado na metodologia qualitativa-
fenomenológica, descrevendo os relatos subjectivos e intersubjectivos das
mulheres entre os 20 e 32 anos de idade, respondendo à pergunta "Como é
que as relações de casal são construídas hoje em dia de um ponto de vista
existencial? Como resultado, são respondidas duas perguntas: Quais seriam
as causas actuais que mantêm a forma de existir das mulheres no processo de
construção de um casal, e qual seria, a partir dos resultados encontrados, a
forma de existir que permite agir de uma forma reflexiva e responsável?
Palavras-chave: Casal; construção; dialógica; compromisso; existencial.
INTRODUCTION
Although in recent years there has been an increased interest in research
topics related to couple problems (Vanegas and Camargo, 2020), the
following research arises from the research problem of the absence of
information on the experiences of women in the construction of couples
today. This interest arises given the sensitivity generated by these human and
social processes in youth and young adults. The construction of couples
nowadays is mainly based on the dialogic exchange that is maintained
through digital media and is strengthened by face-to-face encounters.
The purpose of this study is to understand the experiences of women in the
process of couple building from the existential continuum and discontinuity.
To this end, we seek to describe the subjective and intersubjective accounts
by answering the question of how are couple relationships currently built
from an existential perspective?
The reconfigurations of the processes of couple building today can be
understood from the way power is expressed through the different worlds,
this expression is based on the principles of violence and mutual deception.
The principle of violence is specified by Miller as the first deception carried
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
74
out by the figures of care and power, sending a double information in which
it is specified that one loves, cares, gives opportunities or recognizes merit,
but this is done through acts of violence, repression and deception, facing the
above, the person is educated to deceive himself and the other, looking for
that confirmation to be able to revere himself in his existence.
Hence, the importance of understanding the existential assumptions that
emerge in the reconfiguration of the processes of construction of couples in
women aged 18 to 32 years under the perspective of the principles of violence
and mutual deception, achieving not only to specify the relational dynamics
but also the ways in which the person assumes these processes.
Couple relationships are configured as Sternberg (1988) specifies, from three
elements: intimacy, passion and commitment. For Mayorga-González (2018)
these three elements are represented in the forms of confirmation that people
perceive in each other. According to, Almeida Eleno (2013):
For Sternberg, love is one of the most intense and desirable human emotions.
Human desperation for love goes so far that people may lie, cheat, kill in its
name or even wish for death when they lose it, yet it is also the driving force
behind many of the highest moral acts (p. 58).
Love from an existential point of view, being an emotion implies a constant
exchange with the other, oriented towards the confirmation of appreciation,
affection and respect as recognition of the surrender of the subject to the
relationship with another and that implies maintaining such emotion that we
call love. Mayorga-González (2018) specifies that the existence of the subject
must remain in a world surrendering to multiple constant exchanges with
others, in that exchange the subject assumes roles and also through these
he/she is relating with others from the formal, informal and hidden, until
achieving the configurations of a new world that will be called couple; this
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
75
link implies the construction of in common agreement and thinking about the
welfare of the other (Alzugaray and García, 2015).
Going back to Sternberg's proposal (1988 and 1999) and referenced by
Almeida Eleno (2013) and Capafóns and Sosa (2015), love is configured from
intimacy, passion and commitment. Intimacy is oriented to closeness, union
and affection towards the other, from Honneth's (1997) point of view, the
intimacy that subjects achieve with another is oriented to the search for
appreciation, to feel cared for by another, avoiding the violation of this
intimacy. For Almeida Eleno "the germ of intimacy is in the mutual self-
exposure of the members of the couple" (p. 59), since the exposure of
intimacy can trigger the violation of it, given that the other by mistreating or
violating intimacy tries to take over the body and life of the other person
beyond his or her own will (Arrese Igor, 2009). Nowadays, intimacy is
assumed as the possibility of discovering what is hidden to the other, but to
another who with effort and dedication earns it, even if the subject continues
to feel insecure in offering it.
Passion as an important element in the couple relationship (Levinger, 1996)
and as a second element in the proposal of Sternberg (1988) is oriented
towards the intense desire for contact with the other, for Almeida Eleno
(2013), this element "coincides with the so-called "love at first sight" and
consists of a state of intense desire for union with the other produced by a
mental and physical excitement" (p. 59), following with this same
appreciation passion "is the desire to be with the person with whom we form
the couple. It is, therefore, an ingredient that gives vivacity to the couple
relationship and fosters a healthy attachment" (Capafóns and Sosa, 2015, p.
1).
But the germ of passion in the configuration of a couple's relationship is
exclusivity, since this generates disenchantment, habituation and
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
76
deterioration, that is, "the degree of passion generally decreases more easily
when a reward is obtained on every occasion that one acts, and yet it increases
when sometimes one succeeds, but other times one fails" (p. 59).
The couple ceases to become a hidden world, as it is presented in the intimacy,
but the couple becomes an informal world where the subject is oriented to
seek recognition of opportunity and avoid exclusion. For Honneth (1988) and
later referenced by Arrese Igor (2009) passion in its form of recognition is
oriented towards equal opportunities, because "it depends on the horizon of
collective ideals and goals, in the light of which the contribution of the
qualities of the subjects can be valued" (p. 4). If the passion for the other
manages to maintain the satiety of personal needs and to perceive a merit
before the other, the exclusivity of passion makes the subject feel excluded
with the loss of passionate intensity.
The last element is commitment, understood as "the degree to which a person
is willing to attach to someone and take charge of that relationship until the
end. It is the component that gives stability to the relationship" (Capafóns and
Sosa, 2015 p. 1). For Sternberg (1988), commitment implies loyalty, fidelity
and responsibility, all of the above, generates stability and formality between
the parties, but the main difficulty lies in the fact that this commitment has
different measures and meanings for each of the members of the couple.
Commitment demands the subject to perceive recognition of merit (Mayorga-
González, 2018a), that is, "a recognition of the contribution that the subject
can make to social life based on his personal qualities" (Arrese Igor, 2009),
this implies, that he seeks to avoid the belittlement of humiliation.
Humiliation or dishonor is an experience of devaluation that fragments the
subject emotionally; the humiliated subject cannot understand his own actions
in the partner's world nor perceive love or opportunities from the other.
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
77
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In order to meet the objectives set out, a preference is made for a qualitative
methodology, since this allows access to the arguments given by the same
people involved in the problem raised (Herrera, Guevara, & Munster de la
Rosa, 2015).
Accordingly, qualitative research is specifically oriented to delve into
subjectivity, perceiving the phenomena, probing them from the point of view
of the subjects in a natural environment and related to the context. Delving
into their appreciations and meanings as expressed by Hernández et al.
(2010). For Bautista (2011), qualitative research has an important element
which takes into account the interaction of the subject and object which brings
them closer and thus seeks a way to see internally the phenomenon in
question.
In contrast, this approach is designed in a Praxeological way, since it uses the
inductive method, which pretends to adapt the pre-established theories to the
diverse unipersonal realities that emerge from the study and analysis of the
existing problems, which allows adjustments during the development of the
present investigation. This research does not intend to prove theories or
hypotheses, thus pretending to give relevance to cultural symbols, which have
a unique meaning that gives an unequivocal character to each culture. In
addition to this, taking into account the nature of the data, which are relative
to the experience, verbal and therefore mutable depending on the perspective
of the social group and focused on phenomenology.
Therefore, for Vargas (2011). (2011). the results of this research paradigm are
of an intensive nature, they go from the particular to the general, they have an
in-depth historical profile, thus achieving a naturalistic view of the
phenomenon. In this order of ideas, Bautista (2011) expresses that the
advantage of this research method over the quantitative, lies in the possibility
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
78
of communication with the subjects of study, giving greater importance to
individuals, which puts the researcher and the individual subject of study on
a horizontal plane, so that social factors are seen more clearly in a more
natural context.
In accordance with the above, phenomenology was used as a method that
allows us to examine the contents of the subject's consciousness in order to
describe them as they present themselves (Fuster, 2019; Reeder, 2011).
It is a qualitative study of phenomenological cut, the data collection mainly
occurs from the in-depth interview (Bautista, 2011; Amezcua, 2015), so for
this research a script was designed with three macro categories (see Table 1)
from which a series of guiding questions were derived for the development
of the interviews.
The unit of analysis is 11 women between 20 and 32 years of age from the
city of Bogota who are in the process of building a couple and live in the city
of Bogota, Colombia.
For the development of the research, a theoretical review was carried out,
which resulted in the script for the in-depth interview; subsequently, the
interviews were conducted and the corresponding coding was generated in
order to be able to, finally, analyze the results.
Table 1 - Categories of analysis
Category
Subcategory
The world
The world and its functions in the construction
of a couple
The other
Others and confirmation
The self
Self-referencing
Internal polarities
Triads to exist
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
79
RESULTS
The first assumption to analyze in the construction of a couple is the world
and its functions, although every person is thrown into different worlds
(family, couple, gender, religion, among others), it is she who has to inhabit
it and assume different norms and functions that it demands of her; in the case
of the construction of couples, women consider that from their experience
there are two types of functions in the world of courtship.
On the one hand, the cautious woman who specifies "I let everyone talk to
me, but I am clear that now I do not want to go out with anyone, I only talk
to distract myself" (23-year-old woman) and the other, which we can call an
alert woman "whenever a man talks to me I am attentive because it can be
presented as a possibility for something serious in the future" (27-year-old
woman), in both cases the world is presented with an initial norm and it is
that of conversing and the function of conversationalist emerges, giving way
to the assumption of the others.
Women perceive two types of others, those they consider possible-possibility
and none-possibility, this is presented in the first instance because they are
perceived from the supports (sedimentation) of the ideal of the other, that is,
the woman arrives with an argument in which she evaluates the man to
determine if he can be considered a possibility or not in the future.
"Although I talk to several guys, I really feel that they do not fulfill me, but I
still offer them my friendship" (22-year-old woman). On the contrary, another
discourse states "I am really looking for someone who is attentive to me, who
does not make me feel alone, that we always have plans and who shows me
that I am the one he loves" (19-year-old woman).
In both cases the other becomes an instrument where the ideal partner can be
deposited, or, on the contrary, discarded from that world, but in addition to
the first contact with the other, it happens that as the conversation begins to
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
80
take shape women assume a hyperperception of the man's acts or dialogues,
focusing on the man's confirmations. Couple relationships represent a great
source of support for young men and women, but in the development of these
relationships, dynamics of control and jealousy can be presented and executed
(Cevallos, 2017), which are subsequently interpreted negatively and,
therefore, the formation of a couple relationship can be avoided.
"I like that he always laughs at what I say" (24 year old woman), in this story
we can interpret the possible recognition that she needs from the man she talks
to, this type of recognition is of merit, because she considers that he is giving
a valuable place to what she is doing. But in part of the interview she specifies
"another guy she talked to does not laugh at everything, but I like that he takes
care of me, greets me every day and always dedicates songs or poems to me,
he is very nice to me" (24 year old woman), this type of recognition is that of
appreciation, that is, she specifies in her speech that this man appreciates her
presence in his life, making her feel loved and cared for, finally, she talks
about another man she talks to and points out "well Jaime (name changed by
the author) is super handsome, in the photos he looks great and his voice is
very interesting, but I dislike that he only tries to talk, that everything he says
is debated and that he insinuates that if he were my partner he would ask me
to stop talking to my male friends" (24 year old woman), in this story we can
see the opposite of recognition and it is the contempt mainly in that the girl
perceives the man as prohibiting things instead of giving her more
opportunities for her social development.
With all of the above, we can specify that every ideal of a partner in women
cannot be deposited only in a man and that is why 9 of the 11 women
interviewed stated that they maintain conversations with 1 or even 4 men that
they consider as a possible-possibility because they are seeking to be
appreciated, recognized and with equal opportunities, without leaving aside
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
81
their own cultural support of the prototype of a partner. It is important to
emphasize that this support is based mainly on the development of each
individual, especially the process of adolescence and how the way of relating
to others was established; this given that, in adolescence, identity is
consolidated in multiple aspects (Gaete, 2015).
For them, for a man to become a possible-possibility depends a lot on the
space-time in which he arrives and how he manages to positively engage in
the perception of their confirmation. But all of the above, begins to generate
in them a confusion in their feelings "at times, I think I am confused by their
way of being, because I feel that if I say something I might confuse them, or
on the contrary, I might confuse myself" (30-year-old woman), it seems that
this confusion occurs because the emotions begin to leave in the background
the ideal of a partner "he told me he had a son, I told him at first that I didn't
want to commit myself to anyone who had children, I didn't want to be the
mother, but after we had a conversation and he was so attentive, the fact that
he was a father took a back seat" (23-year-old woman).
As mentioned in the assumption of the world and its functions, cautious
women think that their actions before their possible-possibilities are evident
and instead of nurturing the conversation to achieve a more valuable couple
building, they prefer to keep their intentions distant from the conversation
because "I prefer not to be so obvious, because surely he will notice that I like
him right away, so why say it, although there are times when I feel that he
stops being connected talking to me, but I still prefer not to write him because
then he feels that I am a bold" (21 year old woman).
On the contrary, alert women think that "the question is ultimately theirs, I
think the problem lies in the man's instability, but no matter what, I am always
willing to be there, lest he be the right person" (23-year-old woman), both the
feeling and the thinking of women becomes a constant turn precisely because
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
82
of how they perceive the dialogical changes that their possible-possibilities
have with them, but it is here where beliefs become the bastion to discard or
continue in the world of couple construction with those possible-possibilities.
This leads to consider that the construction of a couple is vulnerable mainly
because "now I want to be alone, I have been with my ex-partner for a year,
surely he left me because I could not always be with him, now I do not want
to think about a partner and I prefer to meet or go out with guys without
commitment, because I am someone who knows how to love, respect and give
myself but I have been hurt a lot" (23 year old woman). In the above account,
the instability of the supports can be evidenced, mainly because, although she
has a belief of herself as a woman, she wants to project another one because
she has lost confidence in her.
But the sedimented and unmodifiable supports are also present in other stories
where they say "I don't want them to come and talk to me about formality,
that is no longer my thing, I have been doing what I want with my life for a
long time, for them to come and lock me up saying that they love me" (30-
year-old woman) or "I am not looking for a game, I want someone who loves
me and that we build a project together, If I have to start by talking, sex and
things like that, I do it, but only if he knows that what I am looking for is a
partner and that is why I give myself to him" (29 year old woman), likewise,
"I am clear that I want a partner, but he cannot be short, nor older than 35, nor
shy, but I have to be precise to get what I want and he is a dog that makes me
suffer" (26 year old woman). In the three previous stories, we find the toxic
sedimentation, which closes any possibility of encounter with others and a
greater vulnerability to believe that any movement of the other is a direct
attack on their beliefs.
To close the referencing assumption, the women interviewed argue that their
real desire is "to be loved, cared for and respected" (women aged 21, 23, 24
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
83
and 29). We could specify with the above a constant fluctuation of women in
their feeling, thinking, believing and wanting that makes the other be
perceived in different ways and ends up becoming an artifact to confirm.
Continuing with the existential exploration, women are constantly subjected
to take an emotional, cognitive, social and spiritual position, but this position
remains in conflict between different polarities. Within the results found we
can speak that emotionally women in the process of building a couple are
fragmented in their feelings, given that many of their supports in this
dimension have been affected by the sum of couple and family histories in
which they have found themselves, for them "the pain I feel, is not a pain of
yesterday, my last partner cheated on me, He always told me that I was the
best he had ever known and one day he suddenly left me" (Woman, 25 years
old), in the same way, cognitively, women in the stage of couple building are
oriented in an argument of individuation, where the search for autonomy
persists as a way of protecting their intimacy because "many times everyone
wanted to take me to bed, to test me as a woman and that made me feel used"
(Woman, 27 years old).
In the social dimension of the personal narrative, we find that women
maintain a narrative of instrumentalization of the other, in which they state
"men only serve at this time to spend, to accompany us women" (22-year-old
woman) and another interviewee indicates "it is not that women at this time
are interested, let's say that giving us the opportunity to talk to several men
opens the spectrum of possibilities and whoever is the best will always have
a better chance of being something serious for us" (30-year-old woman), as
can be perceived in the stories, the other only serves to maintain the person
as existing in a reality that on a spiritual level becomes a continuous
consumption of energy, purposes and frustrations, because, "at the end of the
night, I feel that I do not think of anyone, although I wish I could love again,
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
84
it is better to keep distance from that possibility, just like men think like that,
just go out and that's it" (Woman of 24 years of age). (24-year-old woman).
As we have been able to explore the dimensional polarities of women we can
specify that they remain in constrictive polarities leading them to actions of
existential resistance as we will see in the triads of existing that they
constructively assume.
In the discourses found in the interviews, it has been possible to analyze and
interpret women who, in the process of building couples, find themselves
constructively in referential references that distance them from the possibility
of a true encounter and therefore see in the other an instrument to make them
feel that they exist in the world of the couple, attracting their attention,
seeking not to commit to a stable and lasting relationship. From the above,
we find women who at a personal level are ambivalent, dissonant or
incongruent when they say "I want to be loved and respected, but I do not
know if it is the right time, that is why I talk to someone without looking for
them to feel committed" (26 year old woman), these discourses reveal people
who are confused about themselves, who have lost their security and self-
confidence, but at the relational level we find women oriented towards a
competitive loyalty in which they struggle not to feel responsible for the acts
that occur in the construction of a couple and at the same time manage to be
the only possibility for the person with whom they are talking.
Finally, at the existential level, we find women who, due to the sum of their
histories, have assumed the evasion of their responsibility, generating the
belief that their actions depend on the painful past and little interest in
committing themselves to the future, "I think it is worth thinking about the
present, enjoy it, try new things and always keep those possibilities alive, until
one gets tired and that's it" (23 year-old woman). (23-year-old woman).
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
85
CONCLUSIONS
From the results described above, we can answer two questions. 1). What
would be the present causes that maintain the way of existing of women in
the process of couple building and 2). What would be, from the results found,
the way of existing that allows to act in a reflexive and responsible way.
Answering the first question implies exploring the dilemmas that fluctuate the
existential continuum of the couple building process in women between 19
and 32 years of age, since the confrontation with each dilemma, although it
generates reflection, is overshadowed by the author-referential arguments of
the women in their couple history. We can specify that the dilemmas as
experiential assumptions of the existential continuum come as evidence, cases
such as the traumatic rupture of the couple relationship, makes many of them
perceive that their permanence as a couple is threatened and when they see
that with time this happens, they assume a constructive protection towards
their own capacity to commit themselves in a new relationship.
Another dilemma that arises in women is the encounter with situations that
remind them of their painful histories, as well as other situations in which the
other comes to surprise her with the possibility of being loved again, this
generates a confrontation, because although the woman feels that she does
not belong to the world of the couple, she desires it, and seeing that another
is looking for her generates anguish not only for committing herself, but also
because this other ends up instrumentalizing her, thus, the man's form of
confirmation becomes a threat to her uncertainty.
The other dilemmas that present themselves are the encounter with
possibilities that do not fulfill the ideal and the lack of skills to take
responsibility to say, on the other hand, the continuous questioning of whether
going ahead in conversations with the possibilities makes any sense, is held
back mainly by the search not for a full well-being but for a momentary
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
86
satisfaction of their emotions, using the other as a drug to get away from the
poorly reflected wounds of their past. In conclusion, to the first question the
causes that maintain the constrictive way of existing in the processes of
couple building is the lack of skills to responsibly respond to the existential
dilemmas that life presents in the couple's history.
The second question has its arguments in the question already answered,
because if women are able to reflect and take responsibility for the sum of
their stories, they will not only be able to change their story but also assume
a personal position of what they want in the here and now. With the above,
we can specify that a woman who manages to be emotionally coherent,
committed to the situation in which she finds herself today, capable of linking
herself with the other as she presents herself with the changes she will have
and achieve fullness in the relational dynamics in which she lives, will be able
to express her real interest and manage all her personal processes, to be a
support for the other and thus find meaning despite the decision of the other.
In this research, it was possible to describe an exploration of the existential
continuum, with the purpose of understanding the experiences of women in
the construction of couples, many of the participants came from stormy
relationships or that ended on bad terms, some had been alone for more than
three years, others for 6 to 3 months. The curious thing about the interviews
is that all the women assumed the same constrictive way of existing, that is,
they were unable to assume a position of openness to the other or, on the
contrary, of isolation to reflect on their situation, which leads them to end up
recreating and reliving those traumatic and painful experiences of the past
without seeking to do so.
Finally, in this research it is considered important to achieve a study of the
construction of couples in men and homosexual people, which allows us to
account for the relational dynamics experienced by these people, as well as it
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
87
is important to describe the current experience of couples in young people
and young adults.
REFERENCES
Amezcua, Manuel. (2015). The in-depth interview in 10 steps. Index de
Enfermería, 24(4), 216. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1132-
12962015000300019.
Almeida Eleno, A. (2013), R.J. Sternberg's ideas of love: the triangular
theory and the narrative theory of love. Familia. Revista de Ciencias
y Orientación Familiar. n.º 46, pp. 57-86.
Alzugaray, C. and García, F. (2015). Relationships and psychological well-
being. In: J. C. Oyanedel, M. Bilbao and D. Páez [Eds.], The
happiness of Chileans. Studies on well-being (pp. 237-252). Santiago
de Chile: RIL.
Arrese Igor, H. (November 2009). Axel Honneth's theory of recognition as
an alternative approach to Cartesianism. In Universidad Nacional de
la Plata, Second International Congress of Research of the Faculty of
Psychology. Congress held in La Plata, Argentina.
Bautista, P. (2011). Process of Qualitative Research. Epistemology,
Methodology and Applications. (Manual Mod).
Capafóns, J.I., Sosa, C.D. (2015), Couple relationships and social skills: The
interpersonal respect Behavioral Psychology/ Psicologia Conductual,
23 (1), pp. 25-34.
Cevallos, A., Jerves, E. (2017). Couple relationships in adolescents in
Cuenca: their relationship with machismo / marianismo. 11(2) 126-
140.
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
88
Fuster Guillen, Doris Elida. (2019). Qualitative research: hermeneutic
phenomenological method. Purposes and Representations, 7(1), 201-
229. https://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267.
Gaete, V. (2015). Psychosocial development of the adolescent. Revista
chilena de pediatría, 86(6), 436-443.
Herrera Rodríguez, José Ignacio, Guevara Fernández, Geycell Emma, &
Munster de la Rosa, Harold. (2015). Designs and strategies for
qualitative studies. A theoretical-methodological approach. Gaceta
Médica Espirituana, 17(2), 120-134. Retrieved October 19, 2020,
from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1608-
89212015000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Research methodology
(McGraw-Hil).
Honneth, A., (1997), La lucha por el reconocimiento, Spanish translation by
Manuel Ballestero, Barcelona, Crítica.
Levinger, G. (1996). Committing to a relationship: The role of duty,
attraction, and barriers (translated and adapted by Dr. Rolando Díaz
Loving). Revista Psicología Contemporánea, 1, 30-39.
Mayorga-González, J. (2018). Relational Dynamics: The existential look at
everyday life. Bogotá: Editorial Minuto de Dios.
Reeder, Harry. (2011). Husserl's phenomenological praxis. Bogotá: San
Pablo.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988), El triángulo del amor: intimacy, passion and
commitment. Paidós Ibérica.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999), Love is like a story. A new theory of relationships.
Paidós Ibérica.
Article
Reconfigurations in couple construction: analysis of the existential continuum in women
89
Uribe, V. (n.d.). Edmund Husserl in phenomenology. Universidad
Autónoma Del Estado de Hidalgo.
https://www.uaeh.edu.mx/scige/boletin/prepa3/n7/m9.html
Vargas, C. (2011). The praxeological approach. Corporación Universitaria
Minuto de Dios.
Vanegas, J. and Camargo, J. (2020). Bibliometric analysis as a tool for
monitoring research on variables related to the maintenance of
couple relationships over time. Journal if social and human sciences.
1(1). 78-84.